Sundays I read the New York Times (and do the crossword puzzle). This week, there was a whole section devoted to real estate. Now normally this wouldn’t be of any great interest to me (I’m not interested in NY real estate, being in California) but I couldn’t help but be blown away by the front page’s main story: Selling on the Web–Making Every Pixel Count. Above the fold there were two pictures of the same property–one done by the agent and one by a pro (more examples inside the section)–and the differences were striking.
The article discusses how most buyers use the ‘net to house shop and of those who did, how they “rated photographs as the most useful tool in their search.” Later in the article, Lauren Cangiano of Halstead Property in NY is quoted saying “When you look at the difference between professional photos and ones taken by brokers, it’s not hard to see that you get what you pay for” (emphasis mine).
While a little later on they also interview an agent who shoots his own, I think what he says actually proves that hiring a pro is a better idea:
Mr. Neuwirth takes his own photographs, but he has bought high-end equipment and will spend hours trying to capture the perfect angle “to make sure the pictures tell the story the right way.”
He tries to take pictures using as much natural light as possible. “Shooting at night is always a mistake because the light will come out dreary, and a flash that bounces off a window is just horrible,” he said.
Regardless, the point is that real estate people, who rank at or near the bottom in “cheap client” lists, understand how vital good images are. They get how valuable they are. So, the next time you get a cheap-o client who wants it for free or practically, show them this article. And price your work appropriately.
Alternately, you could send them to this little animated gif (hat tip to Jane G. for the link).